Weekend manager – Terminal 2, the second project for building a passenger terminal, Suvarnabhumi Airport There is a stumbling block (long) after the company Airports of Thailand Public Limited Liability Company or AOT, "Dismantling Plan", dogmatically accelerating construction in conditions of strong opposition votes from 12 professional organizations when the "National Council for Economic and Social Development (NESBB)" or "NESBB" There is an officially "official" letter that disagrees with what the AOT under the leadership of "Nitichai Syirsararn"
That means the "Shrine-shaped Terminal" of the legal man who worked in the DBP-Nikkei group, or "Duangring Bunag Group", which undoubtedly defeated rival rivals near the end. Because the NESBB's complaints are "heavy" and there is a reason to listen
If I still remember earlier, the complaint of the terminal in the form of a temple was extended by many parties. They both care about Thailand's identity As the shape is similar to the sanctuary And also similar to some airports Including concerns about wood-structure and environmental safety, Hygiene Cleaning and Maintenance worry that the airport will become a nest of birds
The key is still not a winner 1 to the winning rival 1, but was beaten with an offense for filing a lawsuit against the Administrative Court. But when the Administrative Court ordered not to receive temporary protection, AOT said it would immediately move ahead of the project, meaning "Duangring Bundag group ", which received the second result, will get the job without having to wait to hear the decision of the Administrative Court.
The AOT claims that the prosecutor can claim compensation, which is not difficult for subsequent legal remedies if the court has a judgment or an order for the prosecutor to get the case. The conclusion is simple, if the loss pays off. Until a question arose The money that was paid was "The Private Money of AOT Directors or someone
At the same time, the AOT area will be used in the construction of the Master Plan, which has been studied. By moving the terminal 2 to the north end of the "Contest A" aircraft without protest from academics. And many professional organizations that are concerned about causing various problems
This issue is considered important.
By representatives of 12 professional organizations, such as the Thailand Association of Consulting Engineers, the Association of Siyam Architects, the Thai Building Industry Association Association of Thai Urban Architects, etc., expressed a position with a unanimous vote of 12 to 0. Original Plan The old version is already good, answering everything. Also, the new master plan will cause excessive density, which will result in reduced quality of service.
That is, AOT should return to extend the western side of Terminal 1 according to the original plan.
Mr Nittichai Siriratikarn, president of AOT, argued that there was a need to improve the master plan at the Suvarnabhumi Airport to coincide. And confirmed that the development of Terminal 2 in the area is in accordance with the revised plan adopted approval by the Board of Directors of AOT.
And he clarified the protester's concerns, citing comments from the International Civil Aviation Organization (IEA), makes people interested in the misunderstanding that Ikeo has agreed with AOT to build a terminal 2, which is Master Plan Who "Dr. Samar Rachapolisit, former deputy governor of Bangkok, disagreed that the Ikeo Response Book does not contain messages that show Ikeo agrees with the construction of the terminal." Illegal 2 Master Plan
"The answer is easy to understand. For people And users can not suffer because of the area of Terminal 2 on the northern side of the road Kanchanapolis has changed the area From the original plan To design the construction on the south side of Banga-Trad Road side To the north side The construction site is a narrow space. You have to solve many problems Especially the rest of the area to make one way fees Result in crowded aircraft Compare as a large department store In a small area "
"Terminal 2 construction that is not a master plan Causing inconvenience to passengers traveling from terminal 2 to board the plane of the second building on a secondary plane, due to the need to use unmanned aircraft or 2 APM lines that consist of APM cables Sky and APM underground lines Including the inconvenience you need to use the remote parking hole Which passengers need to drive the car to board the plane As there are few pit stops in the immediate vicinity of the building In addition, terminal 2, which is a master plan, will cause the plane to be stuck in a taxi. " Dr. Samai can clarify.
While "Dr. Somyte Tinipung, Ph.D., former Managing Director of New Bangkok International Airport Company Limited (Chapter M) clearly states that the airport of Thailand Public Limited Limited (AOT) will continue to build the second passenger terminal, spending more than 4, 2 billion boats. Is an operation that is incompatible with the original master plan or master plan that was laid out in 1993 to accommodate 120 million passengers annually
Finally, the AOT Board of Directors decided to postpone the project for the construction of Terminal 2 at Suvarnabhumi Airport. Because it opposes the above-mentioned reasons, and the second project for building a passenger terminal worth 4.2 billion Baht was suspected, it is not in accordance with the ICAO study report. And not in line with the main plan at the Suvarnabhumi Airport, causing the second passenger terminal project to be delayed
At that time, the AOT board asked NESDB to continue to review the development projects "Phase 3 at the Suvarnabhumi Airport", the remaining 2 projects consist of 1. Project for the construction of a runway or intersection, line 3, with a total amount of 22 billion Bahti and 2. Construction of the extension of the first passenger terminal building on the western side (expansion of the West) The amount of 6.6 billion baht while the NESBB does not have the most urgent letter number 1115/268 from 16 January 2019 to the Permanent Secretary of the Ministry of Transport Asked to direct the opera tions of AOT in the following order
One – the extension of Terminal 1 to the eastern side Who Designed and Studied the Environmental Impact (EIA) is completed. It is important that the Cabinet approved it on August 24, 2010
Two – Prepare the project for expanding terminal 1 on the west side.
And to accelerate the construction of Terminal 2 according to the master plan, which will be located south of Terminal 1 on the road of Bangna-Trat
Not in the wrong position, plan Who is northeast of Terminal 1 on the side of the highway
The NESDB reported that the master plan is still not related to the development of the country's transport infrastructure over the last 20 years, such as the high-speed rail project. Including the effects that may arise from the promotion of the country's land development as a whole
Dr. Abl may declare: "At that time, AOT may not be able to continue building the terminal 2 in the next master plan."
Finish the news.