American man Jason Stiber won his legal battle for hash brown (file photography).
Justice has never tried so well.
Connecticut, the decision of the US judge, has solved a legal problem that has affected some and left others to go hungry: can a police officer make a mistake on McDonald's hash brown for a mobile phone?
In the case of Jason Stiber, the answer is "yes". He was declared innocent after Friday after successfully challenging the 300-dollar harassment race he won last year.
"That was the case with the century," said Stiver's lawyer, John Tigererson, laughing. "He was very pleased. Apparently, he was very pleased."
READ MORE: The man hires a lawyer to prove that he ate a hash brown, not using a phone while driving
Styber's victory comes almost 13 months after he was pulled by police officer Westport, who claimed he had seen the 45-year-old who used his mobile phone in the morning on April 11, 2018. Stiber, who represents himself in court, lost his case but refused to give up Washington Post On Friday, he set aside a "significant" amount of money to hire Tigerson to prove he did not speak at all on his phone.
His willingness to take legal fees – which exceeded the price of the ticket – was a matter of principle, he added.
"Displaced driving injuries go to your record and never fall," said Stiber in an interview. "Plus, many people do not realize that insurance rates are rising."
In February, Westport Police Cpl. Sean Wong Neon testified that he had "clearly" seen Styber talking on a black mobile phone while riding that morning, the hour announced at that time. Wong Vaughn told the court that he had seen Styber holding a bright object with the size of a cell phone to his face as he moved his lips.
Tigerson rejected that claim, explaining that the movement of Steve's lips was "consistent with the chewing" of hex brown that he had ordered at McDonald's earlier. Telephone recordings indicate that Styber had no conversation at the time he was withdrawn, said Tigerson. His client's car also has Bluetooth capabilities that allow him to talk without holding his phone.
To reinforce the defense, Stiber said he made a request for information freedom to obtain data showing that Wong Wong was at the 15th hour of the two-hour shift of 16 hours when he pulled down Stiber; offering another reason why the officer could confuse the fried potatoes for a mobile phone.
Ultimately, the judge concluded on Friday that the state could not fulfill its burden of proof, citing the lack of evidence that Styber actually was on his phone at the time he was withdrawn. Fasting considered a copy of the decision in which the judge quoted an appeal court case involving another Connecticut driver who was found innocent in 2016 after his retirement for use on his phone.
"It's just proof that the policemen – there's nothing wrong here – but the police officers are human and make mistakes, that's all," said Tigerson.
Westport police did not return the request for comment Friday night.
Stiber is acquitted of the verdict, but said long years to defend illustrates a larger problem in the justice system. He had to sit in two trials, miss four days of work and pay a lawyer to get the right outcome – painstaking moves he says others should not be forced to take.
"That's why I did it because I would not want anyone else to go through this," he said. "Other people have no means to defend themselves in the same way".
It remains to be seen whether the Styber case will establish a new precedent in future cases. However, he acknowledged that his troubles forced him to think twice about eating brown cages.
"I definitely did not eat as much as I had before, but I'm still going to McDonald's for other things," he said. "It's a long ordeal, but I prefer to avoid problems in the future."