Saturday , September 26 2020

SPD candidate duel: Olaf Scholz switches to attack


The race for SPD president has been around for a long time. This was already provided by the large number of applicants and the amount of joint appearances. But a key cause of the tragedy was Olaf Holtz: Stoich smiled at the Vice-Chancellor, who had been Clara Gavitz's favorite from the start, at regional conferences all striking out. His strategy seemed to consist mainly of dodging and hugging.

That changed on Tuesday night. In the second ballot of candidates on the ballot, Scholz was suddenly attacked. The man, still hanging from his Secretary General's nickname, "Holzomat", attacked opposing candidates Saskia Esken and Norbert Walter-Borjans, interrupted them, contradicted them and appeared severely resentful several times. His key message: Only if the SPD seems reasonable does it have a chance of an election.

The Willie-Brandt-House discussion, this time without an audience, lasted only a few minutes when Scholz first sank. The Challenger: Critique of Esken and Walter-Borjans Grundrent Compromise. The former finance minister of the North Rhine-Westphalia criticized the blockade of the SPD Union "preventing it from making it truly worthy of all". Folz's response: "If the SPD only achieved enormous success, it makes no sense to undermine it."

He wanted a "militant SPD" who could believe in himself and was proud of what he had achieved, Holtz said. Walter-Borjans seemed surprised: Without a doubt, the land lease was a "milestone", he boasted. Which prompted Gavitz to reiterate what "tremendous bargaining power" was to miss the union over the basic lease more than it had in the coalition agreement. Negotiated – among others – Olaf Holtz.

During the duel, Holt seemed to be amused by the unusual offensive spirit. When Esken described the coalition's climate solutions as "climate packages", Scholz countered that these were almost unanimously accepted by the SPD faction, so they couldn't be bad. As "completely wrong" he dismissed claims that the climate package is not social justice.

SPD candidates Olaf Holtz, Clara Gavitz, Norbert Walter Borjans, Saskia Esken: Clear alternative

John Gallup / Getty Images

SPD candidates Olaf Holtz, Clara Gavitz, Norbert Walter Borjans, Saskia Esken: Clear alternative

Also, Esken didn't give up and seemed to have fun with the split, she developed a real exchange of punches. The confrontation showed that SPD members have a choice between two clear alternatives.

Holz and Gavitz are clearly in favor of extending Groko. Walter Borjans and Essen believe the SPD cannot continue despite the disaster up to 13 to 15 percent as before. In Grokko's question, they do not make a clear exit. However, Essen has requested to negotiate a coalition agreement with the Union.

Holz has the most to lose

Many in the party are waiting for polarization. But so far Scholz has not played, even in the Spiegel debate, the first meeting of the teams in the second round of the election, he was more prepared. What has changed?

One thing is certain: as the only one of the four candidates, Scholz really has nothing to lose. Voltaire-Borjans' political career seemed over, before he ran for office with a book about his fight against tax evaders across the country. Esken as a lawmaker and Gavitz as a former member of parliament win their bid for any profile case. Scholz, on the other hand, is a deputy chancellor, intending to run for chancellor in the next general election.

For this he must first become president of the party. This is not an independent matter, the first round of the membership decision showed. Holtz and Gavitz have just landed in the first place, with many voters from the four losing teams able to settle on the ballot to vote for Walter-Borjans and Esken, the party said.

Holz and Gavitz should now try to reach non-voters: only about 53% of SPD members participated in the first round. Polarization is needed to mobilize sufficient support from the remaining 47 percent. Former party leader Martin Schulz recently said in a double interview to SPIEGEL that he wants Scholz to leave "the vice chancellor in the vice chancellor's office" – that is, to play less state-sponsored.

Scholz fulfilled this request Tuesday night.

Want to answer Sunday's covenant question? Vote here:

How does the Living method work?

The Living Thought Research Institute works with a multi-level, fully automated procedure. All representative real-time surveys are all over Germany
A network of over 20,000 websites has been downloaded ("Riversampling") so that only SPIEGEL ONLINE users are interviewed. Anyone can participate in online surveys and will be included in the representative result with their own answers if they have applied. From these users, Living extracts a quoted sample that guarantees that it fits the population, for example, in terms of age, sex, and population density. Finally, in the third step, the results are weighted by the socio-demographic factors and attitudes of others present to correct distortions and prevent manipulation. You can find more information in the FAQ with Civey.

Why is registration required?

Registration helps to gauge the answers, which will allow the result of the polls, which is representative of the voting population in Germany. Each participant is asked about their gender, year of birth and place of residence. After that everyone can give their opinion in further research on different topics.

How do the results become representative?

Each participant's response is weighted so that the result of the survey is representative of the population. For the Sunday issue and the government monitor, this population covers the voting population in Germany. Weighting is done fully automatically based on the personal details of the registration, as well as the history of previous user responses. More methodological details can be found in the gray area of ​​Belgrade.

Will you reach enough participants online?

Opinion polls are usually conducted by phone or online. The significance of the results depends on how many people can be reached and how much they actually participate in the research when accessed. Internet and landline connections are currently widespread in Germany – with about 90 percent of households, cell phones as high as 95 percent. The willingness to participate in all methods in the single digit percentage range, especially the experts evaluate for telephone surveys.
Thus, in both methods there is a group of people who cannot be reached because they either have no connection to the appropriate network or do not want to participate in the research. Therefore, a significant number of people must always be approached for a meaningful result. Civey surveys are currently in support of SPIEGEL ONLINE on more than 20,000 other websites included, including various media. This ensures that as many populations as possible can be reached.

How to recognize the quality of the result?

Until the research results become representative, sufficiently diverse people must participate. Whether this is already successful makes Civey transparent, as there is a statistical probability of error for each survey result. The number of participants and the time of the interview were published for each survey.

What does it mean when colored areas overlap in graphics?

In our graphs, the statistical error is shown as a colored interval. This interval shows the uncertainty associated with the survey result. For example, on the Sunday question, it is not possible to say exactly what percentage the party would get in the poll, but specify an interval where the outcome is likely to be. If the intervals of the two survey values ​​overlap, then strictly speaking no distinction can be made. For the Sunday question, this means: If the poll numbers of the two parties are so close together that they overlap their error intervals, it cannot be deduced from which momentum would be better served.

What happens to my data?

Users' personal information is kept encrypted on German servers and remains secret. Civey employees only use user IDs for reporting and cannot associate users with their votes. The main purpose of users' personal information is to measure responses and to ensure that surveys are not manipulated. To prevent this, Lively uses both statistical and technical methods. In addition, Live works with external audiences that create audiences. Only when users have accepted the privacy policy of both Gray and an outside partner can your responses be used by the Partner to model those audiences. However, your partner does not receive information about your political and religious views, as well as those you can identify with. Civey users are also not ads based on their responses. You may object to the distribution to your partners at any time here as a logged-in user. More information on Civey's privacy can be found here.

Who is behind the Civey polls?

At the moment, in-app readers and the mobile / stationary website have the opportunity to participate in Civey's representative research. Lively is a Berlin-based online opinion research institute. To compile its representative surveys, the company's software, founded in 2015, merges websites into a nationwide survey network. In addition to SPIEGEL ONLINE, they include "Tagesspiegel", "World", "Wirtschaftswoche" and "Rheinische Post". Civey was funded by Investitionsbank Berlin's ProFit funding program and the European Regional Development Fund.

Source link