Saturday , June 12 2021

"Mars mission on Mars will be almost ridiculous," said the former NASA astronaut



Bill Anders participated in the mission Apollo 8 that managed to orbit the moon, and today considers it not worth sending people to retreat to Mars.

In recent years, mankind has focused on analyzing the possibilities for a new spatial achievement: an achievement on Mars. Magnates like Elon Mash or Jeff Bezos insist that this milestone can be achieved soon. However, there are contradictions to this idea even in those who already know space.

Before the human being can go to the moon on July 16, 1969, it is necessary to prepare all possible scenarios for the Apollo 11 mission to succeed. That is why many missions were undertaken for reconnaissance and analysis of the possible dangers of landing the natural satellite.

Among the missions before the mythical landing of the moon was Apollo 8. This flight in 1968 could orbit the moon for 20 hours, giving it 10 laps around it. He then returned to Earth as a success and improved the spirits to release Apollo 11 next year.

Everyone would say that anyone who worked so that Neil Armstrong could retreat to the moon would agree to do the same on Mars. However, this does not apply to the crew member of Apollo 8 William ("Bill") Anders.

Recently in an interview with BBC Radio 5 Live Anders said it was a bad idea to send people to Mars. He not only criticized the idea of ​​walking on the red planet, but said that the crew mission would be something "almost ridiculous".

The 85-year-old ecstronoun notes that he himself is considered a "defender of unmanned missions". Their reason is simple: they are considerably cheaper. In addition, they think there is currently nothing to motivate them to pursue:

Who is imperative? What makes us go to Mars? (…) I do not think the public is so interested. "

These criticisms fall like a flock of cold water at a time when there is a lot of insisting on the achievement of Mars. Ultimately, the question arises: why did anyone who worked to reach the moon so oppose the achievement of the following? Of course, this will certainly not prevent them from making efforts to achieve this goal.

NASA's critique

Anders knows that he is not very popular in NASA. The reason is that he has always been very critical of the decisions taken after the success of Apollo 11. For example, he currently doubts that the agency will again achieve this achievement:

Today, NASA could not reach the moon. It's too rusty … It has become a program that provides jobs, and many of its departments are barely interested in staying busy. It can be seen that there is not much public interest beyond the fact that their workers receive salaries and their congressmen are re-elected. "

In addition, he criticized the space shuttle program, the International Space Station, and even the idea of ​​placing colonies on the moon and on Mars.


Source link