"I never want to hear any Liberal utter the word 'reconciliation' once again," said former NDP lawmaker Romeo Saganas when he heard the federal government appeal a verdict of indemnification for First Nations children damaged by the system of protection children on reserve.
Justin Justin Trudeau was elected in 2015 partly on the pledge that "no relationship is more important" to him than that to Indigenous Canadians.
However, the news that the government will seek a review of the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal's ruling to pay $ 40,000 to every child from home and community since 2006 suggests a commitment to the cause closer to home – a re-election.
Accepting the CHRT decision ahead of the Oct. 7 appeal deadline requires the Liberals to respond to the compensation package, which will likely amount to more than $ 2 billion in its election platform – just as the Green Party did.
The Conservatives, whose platform is even bigger for money, are also demanding a judicial review. Neither can afford the cost. The liberal platform marks a $ 27 billion deficit next year, even without the usual $ 3 billion risk adjustment pillow. Liberals include some dubious assumptions about operating savings (billions are reserved before they are realized) and missing details on costs (such as pharmacist and maternity taxation).
Adding it to the liberal plan's compensation package would be like Mr Monty Python's Conotote to round out the mint oil.
It is frivolous because there is nothing funny about the treatment of at-risk children on this country's reserve.
A decade after the tears and remorse for the housing schools, Canada is still separating indigenous families. Indigenous children make up more than half of children in foster care, although they represent only seven percent of all children under 15 years of age.
Kenneth Ackexon, reporter for the indigenous broadcaster APTN, created a frightening look at the child welfare system – Death as it was expected he said was linked to the deaths of 102 indigenous children in Ontario alone between 2013 and 2017.
Ackexon first documented the case of Amy Owen, a 13-year-old from Poplar Hill First Nation, who killed herself in the Ottawa group's home. His follow-up investigation over two years revealed chronic underfunding at child services agencies funded by First Nations and a system that was a financial incentive to take children from their families.
In a statement issued by Seamus O'Ragan, the minister for indigenous services, the government acknowledged discrimination and the principle of compensation, but said it wanted time "to address important issues and considerations such as who should be compensated and the role of the tribunal. "
Elizabeth May, the leader of the Green Party, said the decision to appeal was far beyond the normal reach of the "commissioning government" at the time of writing. "" Trude has to explain and reverse this rage, "she said.
But Reagan's statement suggested it was time, rather than the essence of the CHRT ruling, that the government opposed.
"To give us clarity and judgment and time to have these conversations with our partners, which are not possible during the elections, we require judicial review and stay," he said in a statement.
He must hardly explain and reverse this rage
If he said the indigenous groups were "demanding more than we can give now" – as Trudeau did when asked about veterans fighting their government in court – O & # 39; Ragan would be closer to the truth.
It is best to wait until they are safely built to power before adding another billion to the deficit.
The number one call for action from post-residential schools The Truth and Reconciliation Commission has been on the well-being of children and the need to provide adequate resources for indigenous communities to keep families together.
The Trudeau government took steps last spring to renovate the system and move away from the model that tied funding to the number of children in care – a mechanism that provided incentives for agencies to arrest more children. An additional $ 1.4 billion was added over six years to provide the services at the required level.
But an Ackexon study found that 48 of the total 102 deaths occurred in two of the two years Trudeau's government opposed several CRR orders, which Canada has found guilty of underfunding child welfare.
The challenge the Tribunal's decision to make to compensate child victims of a toxic system is just the latest example of Trudeau's government saying one thing and doing the exact opposite, because it was in response to his personal interest.
• E-mail: email@example.com | Twitter: Ivison