Sunday , April 11 2021

John Ivison: The departure of silver foxes from liberal desks is a symptom of Trudo's pressure to the left

The news that Roger Kuzner will not demand re-election in Cape Breton will deprive Parliament of one of his most diverse and collegial characters.

Roger Rimmer is a liberal lawmaker since 2000, earning the reputation of his colleagues from all sides of the House with his earthly pursuit of life and politics. His annual humorous transcript of "Twas The Night Before Christmas" leads the catastrophe of William Tupaz McGonagall's Tay Bridge as the worst poetry in history. But his wit and sound judgment will be missed around the place.

He is not the only silver fox set up to leave Liberal benches. There is speculation that Andrew Leslie, former Lieutenant-General of the Canadian Forces, will not run again for Liberals in Ottawa, driving to Orleans. (Neither Leslie nor the Liberal Party have sent messages that require a comment.)

If his departure is confirmed, it is a sign of the time for the Liberals. Based on the experience, both were to be government ministers. Kuzner was a parliamentary secretary in the government of Jean-Kritin 16 years ago and has since served as a party whip; Leslie was a former head of land personnel who was accused of preparing a report on the transformation of Canadian forces.

However, neither is a true believer in the crusade, Trudo, to change the world. And, essentials, neither ticks the boxes that are important for today's Liberals. It's not fun for old people.

Labor The Liberals presented themselves as a Canadian version of Tony Blair's Third Way, a reconstituted form of social democracy

From a political point of view, both of them still out of date can suggest – they are proponents of the radical center, where realism and pragmatism are more important than idealism and emotions.

This is a stand in the political market, which was abandoned by political parties, if not by the electorate ashamed of the absence of progressive conservative or conservative liberal voting options.

Political satire passed the day when Stephen Colbert said that the election in the United States today is between a party that proposes a vision for armed white people, polluting air and water in an incessant pursuit of profit, without any law other than those of the Almighty; and elsewhere, offering imbi-pambi, a quasi-socialist nation and a homosexual army, while the explosive seizure of citizens who suck in the room of government's well-being.

If the bay is not so pronounced in Canada, it's enlargement. As one Liberal MP said, in a loud voice: "You need to be polarized to be noticed."

Liberal MP Roger Kuzner enters the House of Commons in a hallair as he prepares for a long night of voting, in Ottawa, June 13,

Chris Roussakis / QMI Agency

Labor The Liberals presented themselves as a Canadian version of Tony Blair's Third Way, a reconstituted form of social democracy. They were selected on the agenda for "fairness", which in 2015 meant that taxes would be more "fair" for the middle class. But the definition of "fairness" is now more likely to appeal to people engaged in cultural wars because of inclusiveness, indigenous issues and climate change.

Trudo quickly points his finger at the Conservatives because he is divided, but has proved himself ready to use ruptures caused by political polarization. It seems that he thinks he can win the next election by playing on those divisions.

In the meantime, the conservatives have sapped the possibility of being represented as a center-right party. Andrew Scheer's party downplayed the commitment previously made to meet the climate goals in Paris in Canada; he vowed to kill the carbon tax from Trudo, but he did not say what he would do in his place; and he did little to expand the Conservative tent outside his existing partisans. This may have helped to suppress Maxim Bernier's People's Party at birth, but left many dissatisfied liberals.

There may be a good reason why there is no market-oriented, socially progressive option on the Canadian political market. In his book, It's here right now, former Prime Minister Stephen Harper said the evidence shows the reason is that there is no party that fits that description is that those voters do not exist. "The reason why such people are small in numbers should be intuitive. In the world of rapid and unpredictable changes, ordinary people are vulnerable." An economically market-oriented, socially progressive philosophy essentially proposes to destroy all the security and protection of their lives. On the other hand, voters who are economically intervening and socially conservative are numerous, "he said.

It would be unfortunate if this was the case – most of Canada's post-war achievements were made by governments that were progressive conservatives or conservative liberals.

What is certain is that the Liberal Party will lose two of its clearest voices of reason at a time when it can best afford it.

• E-mail: [email protected] | Twitter:

Source link