England – New Zealand Photo: Gathered
On Twitter, a cricket fan asked: "It's not logical to announce teams of two teams?" Another wrote: "The ICS wins the match by winning England in a fantastic rule in one-day history."
Former Captain of New Zealand, Stephen Fleming, said in a word that everything is "merciless!" Only given the number of the border, the storm takes place through social networking on Sunday night to solve the World Cup Trophy. The 2019 World Cup is called the best match in one-day history.
Cricket included all its glorious uncertainties and beauties in the Lord's rival finals. Where the running or caliph is not at a distance, the result of the competition was written as a border. England beat New Zealand 26-17, England is the champion! The fate of a match similar to the pendulum has changed countless times.
Super over to create an incredible drama filled with an amazing tie game. At the end of the thrill of excitement, the tie again. In the same match twice the result is equal. Ultimately, according to the rules of the Trbrek of the ICC, the title of the title was decided by the border.
In the whole match, including Super Over, England had four and six in total 26, New Zealand 17. Here's the fate of the trophy. After an equal struggle in such a situation, the rules that the title of the World Cup have been resolved, many people can not accept.
Everyone in one sentence says that if the title wins England, New Zealand The former stars, both teams were to be declared joint champions by not winning the title in England with undefeated borders.
Former Australian British Bret Lee criticized the irregular border rule: "It's a very bad method for selecting a winner. This rule needs to change."
Legendary football player Shane Warner, Australia's opinion, "New Zealand is the winner of the game of the game. Whatever the consequences, they have not lost." Another former Australian star, Dean Jones, questions the rhetoric of borders and rules: "The rules should be considered. There may be at least one super over.
The final result of the World Cup finals can not be based on the number of borders. "Former Indian opener Gautam Gambir also asked the same question:" I do not understand how the final result of such a big game is determined by the length of the border,
Strange rules Yuvout Singh, a hero of the 2011 World Cup victory in India, said: "I do not agree with this rule, but the rules are rules."
Former captain of England Michael Vonn wrote on Twitter: "The team did not deserve the rate of this game. For cricket, great one day, this will encourage the new generation to cricket." Such kind of comfort does not bother Kiwi. Media in New Zealand sparks anger Former people are burned to death.
Twitter former Kiwi all-rounder Scott Styris tweeting at the ICC, "I saw it on the ICC well." You are really amusing! "New Zealand Herald wrote:" Nobody won the final of the 22nd year. A rival of cruelty – New Zealand kidnapped Victory, the New Zealand Sports Secretary, Grant Robertson, said: "The Lord did not deserve to end such an amazing game." But the whole country is proud of this team. "
Williamson, who did not want to overcome controversy, was the best example of sport. With the disappointment of the dream, the captain of New Zealand said: "It is difficult to accept such strong emotion that is now working. But the rules are rules.
It's all for everyone. The ICC does not even think that this rule will ever be used. You need to ask a question you did not think. I will have to answer something that I do not think. How did England win? Border or something like that! In the end, the team had to win the title. I am disappointed that we are not that party. "
England captain Eoin Morgan has a similar tone: "It was the best interval that could have gone anywhere, luckily it came to us, there was nothing to separate the two teams into this incredible match." The rules have been made long ago, we have no control over these. "