Michael Baers, a professor at the Department of Political Science at the University of British Columbia, Vancouver says the biggest problem for this concept can be a matter of time. Space-based systems could be possible for decades now, but Earth-based systems have already captured fossil fuels in terms of cost and efficiency. "You can put solar panels everywhere, roofs are the most obvious location, and in some jurisdictions all new buildings must have solar arrays. Many small projects are better than several large because they provide more resistance to equipment failures and weather events, said Baers.
Hopkins said the price competition from the country's energy production company is a real problem, but not insurmountable. As prices fall for solar technology on the ground, they fall on solar energy, which will be used in space. And solar-based space-based – since there can be electricity everywhere in the world – can use the big difference in prices on the communal services market.
The solar-based space-based system can target places like Japan or Hawaii, where electricity prices can be four to five times higher than the United States prices, and then switch to lower electricity prices later, after the solar project you will pay for yourself. "It's military thinking, the money you send to remote military bases can later pay for technology. In the future there's a return on an investment that does not require the sending of electricity in Los Angeles today."
But the slanderers remain convinced that it is an idea that will remain in the world of Asimov's stories.
"The concept of spatial solar energy is and will remain in the field of science fiction for a long time, maybe forever. Even if China or any other nation decides to build a SBSP demonstrator, that does not mean it's a good idea and it's economic meaning to do it, "said L de Vec.
The director of the National Space Society Hopkins said such thinking – along with the inability of the US government to think long-term in planning – could be the biggest risk for all. He said the current US position on the subject tends to fall into one of the two camps.
"People in the United States tend to see how:" At least the Chinese do it, and if the Chinese do it, then we will probably do it at some point because we do not want them to lead. "Others say:" If they get this right and we are not, we are in big trouble. "Hopkins added:" One thing that the Chinese are really good about is to think long-term, unlike US considerations, for 50 years it's no problem to think that way. When I talk to NASA for more than 10 years, they are visibly in the air and turning their eyes off and I'm not invited back. "