Thursday , October 17 2019
Home / argentina / Maurizio de Alessandro's comment on "No One" that upset women at the table of Mirt Legrand

Maurizio de Alessandro's comment on "No One" that upset women at the table of Mirt Legrand



(Video: "The Night of Mirt Legrand", Thirteen Years)

The table of Mirtha Legrand Last Saturday, he invited three women who actively participate in the movement "Ne ga una menos": Tete Kustor, Nancy Pasos and Maria O'Donel. And also received the former tennis player Jose Luis "Batata" Clerc and the lawyer Mauricio D 'Alessandro.

The lawyer found himself at the center of the controversy during a few minutes at dinner and was heavily criticized by the guests after he was assured that "Nothing less" had no "high ideological charge".

Thereafter, there was an intensive exchange of ideas between the journalist, the lawyer, Tete Kustor and Nancy Pasos.

-Maria O & # 39; Donnell: What do you mean by "ideological"?

-Mauricio D & # 39; Alessandro: That behind the gender issue was a hidden vision related to the "K" government. It is absolutely appropriate. Today this is no longer happening.

-Nancy Pazos: There is nothing to do, the gender issue has to do with gender, not political ideology.

-You're the Coaster: When you say an ideological indictment, is it to be diverted from "Not one minus"? Why do you say that?

-Oh Donel: He says it is a philosophical movement. It has nothing to do with it.

– D? Alessandro: This is what I'm saying, it was a movement of a kyrneristic filado. Actually …

-Coustarot: But you do not know the women who organize it.

-D & # 39; Alessandro: More or less, because I went on a march, not a hundred marches.

-Paze: Do you think that the Maqris woman from "Nothing less" was mobilized? You are completely wrong. He was numerous.

-D & # 39; Alessandro: Yes, but there was an ideological charge.

-Oh Donel: Everything is ideological, it's like saying: "It's political." It is a policy: to influence the public agenda. Naturally, women who mobilize against macho violence have an ideology that has to do with the completion of patriarchy, the relationship of forces and the change of culture. Then, there is an ideology. What you said was that it was under the ideology that put the cloak of the second intention of Kirchner, buried behind "Nothing less."

-D & # 39; Alessandro: Yes, it was, it was. What I'm saying is that only these 500 actresses …

-Oh Donel: But on the basis of what you say?

-D & # 39; Alessandro: Based on many abortion related …

-Oh Donel: Christina was against the decriminalization of abortion.

-D & # 39; Alessandro: What should I do? I'm talking about "Ni Una Menos", which is a previous debate, not for Christina. I confirm that, at least what I believe is that these new 500 actresses were "de-ideologized" (in the case of Juan Dartes).

The discussion was still at the table of Mirt Legrand and quoted D'Alessandro Amalia Grenade in order to try to express her point of view: "It is in favor of the theme of Fardin and was powdery, because, As a pro-life, it can not be on your side … She said: "No one was freer than me with my body. I was responsible, grabbing Robbie Williams because it seemed to me too it does not mean that you need to accompany the ideology of terminating pregnancy& # 39; "

However, the example did not stop the debate, but quite the opposite. It's about to finally get tired and end the topic: "You did not make me harass me! Since I am 500, I already have it Sweet potatoes (Clerk), we gather together and we make the antibiotic. "


Source link