Friday , February 21 2020
Home / africa / HR17 was campaigning purely, the Presidency says, despite funding leaks

HR17 was campaigning purely, the Presidency says, despite funding leaks

Raising President Cyril Ramafosa's high-profile post was paved in a "pure campaign", the Presidency said Saturday, noting that leaking confidential banking information to financiers is a breach of privacy.

"The selective circulation of this banking information is clearly intended to dispel aspects of the President and follows the recent Public Protector's report, which had a significant focus on funding the CR17 campaign," a spokeswoman Kusela Dico said in a statement.

She said the information submitted to the media, reportedly only available by the Office of the Public Defender, includes third-party bank accounts that record private transactions and are strictly confidential.

"The Presidency notes serious concerns which mean a violation of the constitutionally guaranteed right to privacy. This is still disturbing because it seems clear that this information was first obtained illegally. "

Dico reiterated that Ramafosa's legal representatives had approached the courts to seal certain documents contained in Boussiev Mhweban's report on Bosasa.

READ: Ramaphosa asks court to seal "illegally obtained" documents in Public Protector's "Bosasa" report

Ramafossa, through a letter from Harris Nupen Mollebaci, who saw News24, said that certain bank statements in her report contained confidential information belonging to third parties.

Newspapers submitted by the president's lawyers on Thursday suggested that some bank statements could be obtained illegally.

Dico said on Saturday that Ramafosa's request was awaiting confirmation of whether the information was obtained legally and whether it was the legal source for the complaint under investigation. given suits

"It should be noted that, if the request is granted, nothing prevents the court from making a decision, once it has determined the legality of the source of the documents and the appropriateness of including them in the record, that all or all of the information should be part of published. "

She argues that neither the President nor the campaign has done anything wrong, ethically or legally.

"It is a common and accepted practice in South Africa and around the world for parties and candidates to raise funds from campaign donors. From the outset, the CR17 campaign team and the candidate agreed that this should be a clean campaign that worked within required legal recipes and in accordance with the values ​​and principles of their organization, "Dico said.

No special services or unnecessary advantage

She argues that the campaign has been arranged to raise funds from private individuals who have supported the effort to restore ANC's integrity and cohesion and to bring South Africa back on the path of growth and transformation, with the explicit understanding that their contribution will not earn you any special services. or unnecessary advantage.

"The funds were raised from a wide cross-section of South African society, sometimes with the help of people supporting access to various networks. More than a hundred people contributed to the campaign on their own funds. The donations were made on a confidential basis," Dico said.

"As the President pointed out in response to the Public Protector's notification in Section 7 (9), as well as in his founding affair before the court, the funds were used to support a variety of campaign activities, including mobilization, communication, research, security. , administration, logistics support (travel and accommodation), as well as scholarships and salaries. Funds were also provided to coordinators in the provinces across South Africa.

"The coordinators have used these funds to organize meetings and rallies, to organize transportation, to hire places, to provide accommodation and more. The president is reassuring the South African public that HR17 was campaigning purely in the spirit of some of this country's rich democratic traditions – namely responsibility, honesty and integrity, "Dico said.

READER: Ramaphosa v. McWeban: PP insists Bosa's report is above board, as president marks president's "illegal" activity

Meanwhile, Mr Mhbeban's office claims her report is above the board.

“PP [ Public Protector] conducted the investigation of the book. There were none [un]legal activity, "Mr Mhbeban's spokeswoman Oppa Segalve told 24h24 on Friday.

Once submitted to court, the documents become public information that will be accessible to all, Segalve said.

News24 revealed over the weekend that leaked emails from the CR17 campaign showed that Ramafosa had consulted his campaign managers about certain potential donors, despite repeated denials that he was involved in the campaign's fundraising efforts.

The e-mail received from 24uz24 formed part of McWeban's report on DA and EF complaints about the response given by Ramafosa to DA leader Mamusi Meiman in November 2018.

Maiman was asked about the alleged pay-off of President Andil's son from a Bosasa company accused of corruption.

But it turned out, the payout mentioned by Maiman was actually a donation to the CR17 campaign by Bosasa CEO Gavin Watson – which Ramaphosa himself revealed in a letter to the speaker of parliament.

Source link